The Met scores a major legal win, unlocking full power to probe all past misconduct claims during police vetting. This landmark ruling supercharges efforts to raise standards and oust dodgy officers for good.
Big Win: Met Granted Full Vetting Muscle
The Court of Appeal has smashed aside a High Court block that limited how the Met could look at unproven misconduct claims during vetting. Previously, only “exceptional” cases counted. Now, forces get free rein to probe all past allegations — proven or not — as part of their crackdown on dodgy cops.
Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley Slams Police Fed
“Today’s judgment is a crucial step in ensuring top standards in policing and rooting out those unfit to serve. The public will welcome this common-sense move — they have the right to know officers don’t have a back catalogue of alarming claims. Our good officers, who care deeply about public safety, will welcome it too.”
“The legal challenge was fired by an officer facing removal over three unproven rape allegations and other conduct concerns. Shockingly, the Police Federation funded his fight using members’ subscription fees. It’s hard to believe female members backed spending money to keep an alleged rapist on the force.”
“We’ll keep pushing nationally to sack those who damage our integrity, confident the courts are on our side.”
New Vetting Rules Get Legal Backing
The ruling cements that vetting must focus on future risks. Officers can be assessed even if allegations never led to charges or proof. Decision-makers can weigh all relevant information. This backs new Home Office regulations rolled out in May, which mean officers failing vetting after a fair process lose their jobs automatically.
Operation Assure: The Clean-Up Continues
The Met is charging ahead with Operation Assure, reviewing officers flagged under the new rules and diving into fresh cases as they crop up. With police integrity under the microscope, the Met is determined no shady characters will slip through the net.
